<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: World&#8217;s smallest robot useful for exploring human-unreachable spots</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techchee.com/2007/09/29/worlds-smallest-robot-useful-for-exploring-human-unreachable-spots/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techchee.com/2007/09/29/worlds-smallest-robot-useful-for-exploring-human-unreachable-spots/</link>
	<description>We bring you interesting topics of hot gadgets and high tech stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 04:27:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: laertes</title>
		<link>http://www.techchee.com/2007/09/29/worlds-smallest-robot-useful-for-exploring-human-unreachable-spots/comment-page-1/#comment-375341</link>
		<dc:creator>laertes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 08:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techchee.com/2007/09/29/worlds-smallest-robot-useful-for-exploring-human-unreachable-spots/#comment-375341</guid>
		<description>Small robot for sure.  One quarter cubic inch?  No.  At least not the bot in the picture, which is sitting on a U.S. quarter and overhanging it at the back side of the robot.  Parked fully on the quarter, it would clearly be the size of a quarter in length.  That&#039;d make it about an inch long.  Multiply by the height (apparently almost the same as its&#039; length) and you get one cubic inch MINIMUM!  Pisses me off as it&#039;s a techy object and not nearly represented accurately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Small robot for sure.  One quarter cubic inch?  No.  At least not the bot in the picture, which is sitting on a U.S. quarter and overhanging it at the back side of the robot.  Parked fully on the quarter, it would clearly be the size of a quarter in length.  That&#8217;d make it about an inch long.  Multiply by the height (apparently almost the same as its&#8217; length) and you get one cubic inch MINIMUM!  Pisses me off as it&#8217;s a techy object and not nearly represented accurately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandia mini-robot - smallest robot</title>
		<link>http://www.techchee.com/2007/09/29/worlds-smallest-robot-useful-for-exploring-human-unreachable-spots/comment-page-1/#comment-10521</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandia mini-robot - smallest robot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 01:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techchee.com/2007/09/29/worlds-smallest-robot-useful-for-exploring-human-unreachable-spots/#comment-10521</guid>
		<description>[...] This mini-robot developed byÂ  is not very fast, not very agile, but he&#8217;s so small - it&#8217;s kinda cute. As far as I know he might be the smallest autonomous robot ever made. If the developer succedes in making him faster, he might end up very useful. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This mini-robot developed byÂ  is not very fast, not very agile, but he&#8217;s so small &#8211; it&#8217;s kinda cute. As far as I know he might be the smallest autonomous robot ever made. If the developer succedes in making him faster, he might end up very useful. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

